E-Editions | Subscriptions | Contact Us | About Us | Classifieds | FREE Classified Items Under $50 | Photos
The Lakeland Times | Minocqua, Wisc.

Jim Tait Real Estate

home : news : news May 26, 2016

11/9/2012 4:34:00 AM
Times sues LUHS for records in Fortier coaching case
Document goes to the heart of LUHS accountability and veracity, Walker says

Richard Moore
Investigative Reporter

The Lakeland Times has filed an open records lawsuit against Lakeland Union High School, after the school district denied the newspaper access to two pages of purportedly negative comments about incoming LUHS boys’ basketball coach Rich Fortier, Times’ publisher Gregg Walker announced this week.

Top school officials compiled the comments earlier this year during the hiring process for the coaching position and distributed them to at least one school board member in August, as well as to an informal advisory citizens’ committee for the position. 

Walker said it is in the public interest to release the records.

“The administration went to great lengths to gather two sheets of negative comments, supposedly by calling Mr. Fortier’s former employers, and thought them important enough to give them to selected members of the public, specifically the informal and advisory citizens’ committee,” Walker said. “Every member of that committee subsequently recommended another coaching candidate. The public has a right to know what was said about the new coach and who made the remarks.”

What’s more, Walker said, Fortier should have the right to defend himself against the comments.

“While the general public does not know what was specifically said, the public does know that supposedly negative comments exist,” Walker said. “The school district should not be allowed to force the public to imagine what the comments were, or to leave Mr. Fortier defenseless against phantom perceptions.”

Finally, Walker said, the newspaper called all of Fortier’s listed references, as well as four other former supervisors, and found that none of the references and only one of the former supervisors had been called; none said they had made any negative comments.

“This causes us to wonder who the administration called,” Walker said. “It goes to the veracity of the administration’s conduct and to the honesty of the process. This is unquestionably in the public interest.”


The complaint 

The lawsuit was filed in Vilas County circuit court Wednesday by the newspaper’s attorney, Robert Dreps of Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. The complaint lays out the factual background leading to the newspaper’s request and the school district’s denial.

“During the summer of 2012, LUHS was considering two candidates, Rich Fortier and Levi Massey, to fill the vacant position of head boys’ basketball coach,” the complaint states. “LUHS formed a five-member committee of citizens to interview the two candidates and express their opinions on which should be hired. The committee met and interviewed the candidates on August 23, 2012. The minutes from that meeting state that ‘[a]ll members of the committee had the opinion that Mr. Levi Massey was the best choice for the position.’”

After the interviews took place, but before the members’ recommendations, the LUHS administration provided the  committee members with the two pages of negative comments about Fortier, which, the complaint points out, the administration later said were “notes drafted by Athletic Director Justin Szews and Principal James Bouché regarding their telephone conversations with prior employers of Mr. Fortier.”

LUHS district administrator Todd Kleinhans made that assertion in his Sept. 10 denial letter to Walker.

According to the complaint, LUHS did not provide the citizen committee members with any comments about Massey, while the negative comments about Fortier were attached to an email dated Aug. 27 from Kleinhans to LUHS school board member Joe Fahrenbach.

As The Times has reported and the complaint reiterates, board member Tami Schroeder asked LUHS administrators at the board’s meeting on Aug. 27 why the interview committee had been provided with negative comments about one of the candidates, but no comments about the other candidates. School officials did not answer her during the open portion of the meeting.

Because Schroeder possessed the comment sheets at the meeting, and because they were twice mentioned at the meeting, Walker made his open records request for them.


The claims

The newspaper’s complaint asserts that, under the open records law, the denial of public access to records can only be justified in extraordinary situations.

“Under the Open Records Law, Wis. Stat. § 19.31, it is the declared public policy of this state that every citizen is entitled to the greatest possible information regarding the affairs of government,” the complaint states. “(The statute) affirms the presumption of complete public access to government records, consistent with the conduct of governmental business. The statute provides that ‘[t]he denial of public access generally is contrary to the public interest, and only in an exceptional case may access be denied.’” 

This is not an exceptional case, the complaint asserts.  

Neither can LUHS claim the comments’ sheets are statutorily exempt letters of reference, another contention made by LUHS officials, the complaint contends.

“The actual letters of reference submitted to LUHS by Mr. Fortier’s former employer were not provided to the citizen committee,” the complaint states.  

What’s more, the complaint continues, “(o)n information and belief,” the comments LUHS officials provided to the citizen committee and to at least one school board member did not represent a true and fair report of the comments of Fortier’s prior employers.  

“To the contrary, those comments were either selectively edited to negatively portray Mr. Fortier or they were not made by anyone who could fairly be described as his prior employer,” the complaint states.

Then, too, the complaint adds, the two pages of negative comments concerning Fortier are not exempt from disclosure under the common law balancing test, as LUHS contends. Such a test weighs whether the public interest in disclosure is outweighed by a public interest in nondisclosure. The school has argued that releasing such information could have a chilling effect on its ability to attract and hire staff.

In fact, the complaint asserts, just the opposite is true.

“Contrary to the defendant’s position, a biased hiring process structured to unfairly favor one candidate over another is more likely to ‘have a chilling effect on those who might otherwise seek public employment’ than would public disclosure of the record at issue,” the complaint states. “Shielding LUHS administrators from accountability for their conduct of this hiring process by concealing the record at issue is contrary to the public interest and to the Open Records Law’s presumption of complete public access.”

The complaint asks the court to compel the defendant to permit the newspaper to inspect and copy the requested records, and to award The Times reasonable attorneys’ fees, actual costs and damages.

Richard Moore may be reached at richardmoore.gov@gmail.com

Reader Comments

Posted: Monday, December 17, 2012
Article comment by: Chris Hansen

Mr. Handrick, I am speaking of the persons that are interviewed during the course of a background investigation. Identities of persons interviewed are kept confidential so that they can speak freely and honestly so as to avoid retribution. A background investigator can interview whoever he wants, and is not limited to former employers or personal references. You point out that I don't know anything about this situation. I do know that the list they are asking for contains the names of people who are not personal references or former employers. As I stated above, a good background investigator would dig deeper, rather than just talking to personal references or former employers. These inteviews should then be viewed by the hiring committee and considered at face value. These people interviewed under conditions of anonymity are not required by any law to be truthful and honest. It's up to the committee to review all the information as a whole, to consider the source of the information, and select a person for the job. Obviously the hiring committee didn't deem these negative comments to be damning for Rich Fortier because they hired him anyway. In any event, these persons must, and I'm sure will, be kept confidential. I'm sure these negative comments were also submitted in conjunction with a lot of praise for Mr. Fortier.

Posted: Friday, December 14, 2012
Article comment by: tom handrick

Mr Hansen says that these records are kept confidential so that people will be honest and forthcoming. Well if you were knowledgable about the situation you would know that there may be one or more people who have not been honest and forthcoming and that list DOES NOT include Mr Fortier, his former employers or the references that Mr Fortier provided in his application. The question is why would someone go so far to stop Mr Fortier from becoming the new basketball coach. The LUHS administration did not to wish to hire the least qualified candidate and set the program back for years to come. It seems that their goal was to prevent a highly qualified candidate from getting the job for some reason.

Posted: Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Article comment by: Chris Hansen

Mr. Handrick brought out the "c" word. Conspiracy! What is the conspiracy anyway? By your logic it seems that the LUHS Adminstration conspired to hire the least qualified coach and set the basketball program back for years to come. That's what you expect everyone to believe? We don't know the whole story behind the selection process because it is confidential. These records are kept that way so that people will be honest and forthcoming with information without having to worry about retribution.

Posted: Monday, December 10, 2012
Article comment by: Tom Handrick

James, If it is as unimportant as unimportant can get, why doesnt the luhs administration turn over the records.
It is not the Lakeland Times that has created this controversy it is the administration. The newspaper is only trying to get to the bottom of the conspiracy.
Are you one of those that doesnt like the Times because they publish factual information that makes some public officials look stupid. Maybe its the public officials that you should be yelling at, they are the ones that are truly wasting taxpayers money

Posted: Wednesday, December 5, 2012
Article comment by: James Hetfield

Do you people really think that this is worth suing over? Are you that petty? It's basketball. It is as unimportant as unimportant can get. So you need to squeeze money out of a public school that is intended to help others? You are effectively stealing from tax payers if you win.This newspaper is worthless, as are those who run it.

Article Comment Submission Form
Please feel free to submit your comments.

Article comments are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor, who may edit content for appropriateness. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the web site editor reviews and approves it.

Note: All information on this form is required. Your telephone number is for our use only, and will not be attached to your comment.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Last Name:
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.

Advanced Search
search sponsored by

Subscription Login


Life | Snow/Trail Conditions | Road Conditions | Wisconsin Lottery | Facebook

Lakeland Printing, Inc. • P.O. Box 790 • Minocqua, WI 54548

The Lakeland Times • The Northwoods Super Shopper
Phone: (715) 356-5236 • Fax: (715) 358-2121

Members of the Wisconsin Newspaper Association, Wisconsin Community Papers, Rhinelander Area Chamber of Commerce, Minocqua Area Chamber of Commerce

Software © 1998-2016
1up! Software
, All Rights Reserved