E-Editions | Subscriptions | Contact Us | About Us | Classifieds | FREE Classified – Items Under $50 | Photos | FREE E-Editions
The Lakeland Times | Minocqua, Wisc.

Mulleady Realtors

home : news : news August 24, 2017

4/14/2017 7:28:00 AM
Wisconsin Wolf Summit II separates facts from fiction
Beckie Gaskill/Lakeland Times

Senator Tom Tiffany started out the Wolf Summit II — Focus on Wisconsin meeting last weekend in Sugar Camp by saying the wolf issue is now a bipartisan one and encouraged attendees to contact their federal legislators to let them know returning management control to the states needs to be addressed sooner rather than later.
Beckie Gaskill/Lakeland Times

Senator Tom Tiffany started out the Wolf Summit II — Focus on Wisconsin meeting last weekend in Sugar Camp by saying the wolf issue is now a bipartisan one and encouraged attendees to contact their federal legislators to let them know returning management control to the states needs to be addressed sooner rather than later.

Beckie Gaskill
Outdoors Writer

Wolf Summit II - Focus on Wisconsin was held last weekend at the Sugar Camp town hall. The meeting was well attended by various stakeholders from across the state. Attendees came from as far away as Dane County to discuss the wolf in Wisconsin and how it fits into the overall landscape, including acceptable population levels as seen by different groups. Disease and the need for reforming the Endangered Species Act were also presented as well as public opinions on wolves in general.

The morning started with an update from Senator Tom Tiffany on what has been happening since the first Wolf Summit in Cumberland. He said there is now bipartisan support for the delisting of wolves and returning their management back to the state level. Many democrats, he said, are getting onboard now as well. He commended Wisconsin Wolf Facts on disseminating information about wolves and helping people to understand the issues and for putting together the summit. He also stated sportsmen are a key constituency and have a great influence on elections when issues such as control of wolf populations are on the minds of people. He urged all in attendance to continue to contact federal representatives and let them know the importance of getting state control of wolf populations back sooner rather than later.

History of wolves in Wisconsin

David Ruid, a wildlife biologist from USDA Wildlife Services, presented a history of wolves in Wisconsin from the days of the wolf bounties up through their listing as an endangered species. He discussed an integrated management approach which would allow the lethal control of problem wolves that had caused conflicts, which could happen if wolves were listed as only threatened rather than endangered. He also discussed a fully integrated management approach, which would include a harvest season on wolves. Ruid provided information that showed, after three years of having a harvest season once the wolves were delisted in 2012, conflicts with wolves had dropped - in some cases fairly significantly.

Ruid said state-controlled management offered the greatest flexibility in management as well as effectiveness and efficiency. He said the DNR has also shown the ability to manage wolves well while still keeping sustainable populations, which is the ultimate goal. The goal of the harvest season, he said, was to slowly and incrementally reduce the populations to a manageable and acceptable level, which is what was happening with the fully integrated management approach.

How wolves are counted

DNR large carnivore and furbearer scientist Nathan Roberts spoke about how wolves are counted and populations estimated. The wold numbers put forth by the department, he said, are minimum numbers and populations are different than minimums. Population minimums are estimated in the winter time. At this time the populations are at their lowest and are also more easily seen during aerial surveys. He said there is no question wolf populations have recovered and that the Department still wants to monitor them for management reasons. He discussed the difference between radio telemetry and GPS tracking and how much more information can be readily available when animals are tracked via GPS. He talked about how wolf populations are estimated now and what may be done looking forward.

Diseases and the spread by canids

Jim Beers, who is retired from the US Fish and Wildlife Service, provided the group on information regarding the 30 diseases that can be spread by canids, 27 of which can are zoonitic, or which can be transmitted to humans. These diseases, such as tape worm, parvo, anthrax, small pox and prion diseases, he said, can be picked up by canids such as wolves and transmitted across the entire range of that animal. These diseases could be transferred through saliva, mucus or feces of a carrier animal. He was unclear whether wolves were a main vector for spread of diseases such as this, but hypothesized that the possibility of a predator or scavenger picking up a disease and transporting it was fairly likely.

Beers did have some concern about returning management back to the state, calling it a mirage. He said management should be done at an even more local level, like is now done with deer through the County Deer Advisory Committees.

Survey results - willingness to live with wolves

Mike Brust and Laurie Groskopf of Wisconsin Wolf Facts presented information from a survey regarding people's willingness to live with wolves. Overall, it showed the more closely people lived with wolves and dealt with conflicts, the less apt they were to tolerate wolves. The majority of people who showed a high tolerance for wolves did not live within the wolf range. Groskopf echoed Beers' idea that wolf management should be done by those who live in wolf territory rather than even statewide. She had sent sample resolutions out to 34 county boards as of the date of the meeting asking them to propose a wolf population of not more than 350 statewide. Many counties agreed with this resolution, she said, and several even proposed a smaller minimum, all the way down to no wolves in the state. She stated she had been amazed by the response from the county boards to which she had presented her proposal.

Brust asked the question "who should be considered first?" when setting population goals for wolves. Surveys indicated opinions of those who live in wolf territory should be weighted more heavily, as they are the people who are dealing with and trying to manage conflicts.

A citizen panel was also present to bring their wolf experiences to light and to show how intimidating it can be when wolves become habituated to humans. One couple had wolves within 30 feet of their farm home, a place where their children and dogs play. They had encountered wolves at a distance too close for comfort several times. They also lost a horse when wolves stalked it from outside of its enclosure. The horse broke free of the fence and ultimately had to be put down. They pointed to the unseen damage of wolf conflicts. The sleepless nights and worries of farmers about their animals and, indeed, their families, is something that could not be quantified, they said.

Another citizen told a tale of his hunting land, once flush with deer, now basically worthless to him. He had encountered a wolf years ago while bird hunting, he said, and the choice became either his dog or the wolf. Others in the audience spoke of seeing deer yards decimated with the deer left dead and not eaten. Wolves, one panelist said, have to train their pups to hunt and how to kill their pray. This is done by killing animals for practice, they said, rather than just for food. This is the way adult wolves train their young to find and kill food, giving them their best chance for survival. Many hunters shared stories of areas where deer were once abundant, and now it was rare to see them.

While no particular solutions were achieved at the wolf summit, a great deal of information was shared by many professionals in the wildlife field as well as by those affected by conflicts. Some wondered if the wolf population had gone too far already, pointing to places such as Idaho, where wolf tags are given out in hopes each hunter would harvest five animals and still their wolf numbers are higher than they would like. Most people in the room agreed there is a problem in some areas of the state that could be better controlled through a fully integrated management approach. This year's wolf count has just been submitted and the information is currently being assembled, Groskopf said. A public meeting will be held, she believed in Wausau, in May to review the minimum population estimates from this past winter. More information about that meeting will be published in The Lakeland Times as it becomes available. Further breakdowns of the Wolf Summit will also be published in the Outdoors section in coming weeks.

Beckie Gaskill may be reached via email at bjoki@lakelandtimes.com.

Reader Comments

Posted: Monday, April 17, 2017
Article comment by: Patrick Quaintance

We just need to manage the wolf period! I do not know of anyone that wants the wolf all gone! The sciences says we did not start have many problems when the population reached 350! We all voted for 350 or less so lets start there! Please people the wolfs are getting the bad rap here the anti-s are loving these wolfs to their death! The bigger the population the more problems it is that simple! Until we take the population down and start ending some of the problem wolfs the problem is going to get bigger! And more wolfs get killed without anyone knowing about them being kill so who is the problem!

Posted: Sunday, April 16, 2017
Article comment by: Tim Behselich

Idaho v. Wisconsin.
Apples v. Oranges

Posted: Saturday, April 15, 2017
Article comment by: James Zeiler

Mr. Watkins rambling commentary reached no logical points or conclusions. Deer ticks, forest management or Senator Tiffany were not the topics of concern.
Wolves have become a serious problem across the northern portion of Wisconsin. A Federal judge sitting in Washington DC is ill-equipped to make wildlife management decisions for WI. Let's not even mention Federalism or question if the states are sovereign entities or merely provinces of the Central Government. Instead lets focus on controlling wolves before farmers and rural landowners are grievously harmed or a person is tragically killed.

Posted: Friday, April 14, 2017
Article comment by: Adam Kassulke

Complete nonsense and highly biased. The organizers of
This "summit" refused to include wolf conservation groups
In it even those who favor management but that based
On science not politics. Further the survey cited is
Biased as the individual conducting it is a long time
Opponent of wolf conservation

Posted: Friday, April 14, 2017
Article comment by: Richard Ringelstetter

I live in Idaho. I also bow hunt elk here. For years I have heard the complaint that the wolves have killed all the elk. The last two years have proven otherwise. Both years are record harvests for the modern era. The problems that do exist with elk population are an aging hunter population that is less likely to get off of forest roads to hunt where the elk are and the maturation of forest cover that reduces food sources for the elk. Wolf harvest have been much lower than expected with open hunting for much of the year. The wolf population appears to be quite stable here and probably reached a prey/ predator balance all on its own. I love elk. I love to hear them bugle in the fall woods. I admire wolves. I love to hear them howling in the middle of the night. I think there is room enough for all of us if we just give one another a little respect and patience. Hunters have complained every year they fail to harvest prey since time immemorial. It iis what they do.

Posted: Friday, April 14, 2017
Article comment by: Radley Watkins

I did not see anything in the article showing representation from groups like the Timber Wolf Alliance A group that is open to wolf hunting and other forms of management, but only with real science. I believe this summit created more fiction than it presented facts. Just because a hunter says his property does not have deer on it anymore is no proof that wolves are a problem. When I was a kid hunters said they hunted to control the deer populations because there were no other large predators. Now hunters say there are too few deer for them to hunt, yet they are willing to go hunt the few that are left. I personally believe the information that forest ecologist present that says there is an over abundance of deer. In fact forest management requires tax dollars to be spent to spray blood on saplings to protect them from deer. The reason there once were more deer in Northern Wisconsin is because we cleared all the forest making a temporary savanna. We could clear more forests, something Tom Tiffany actually promotes, but we have to remember that theses cleared forests and edges increase tick populations along with deer populations. There are currently at least 6 tick born disease in Wisconsin, which are much more likely to cause residents harm than are any wolf diseases. The problem is not the wolves, but people who don't know how to sustainable exist in the natural ecosystem in which they live.

Article Comment Submission Form
Please feel free to submit your comments.

Article comments are not posted immediately to the Web site. Each submission must be approved by the Web site editor, who may edit content for appropriateness. There may be a delay of 24-48 hours for any submission while the web site editor reviews and approves it.

Note: All information on this form is required. Your telephone number is for our use only, and will not be attached to your comment.
Submit an Article Comment
First Name:
Last Name:
Anti-SPAM Passcode Click here to see a new mix of characters.
This is an anti-SPAM device. It is not case sensitive.

Advanced Search
search sponsored by

Subscription Login

American Investigator


Life | Snow/Trail Conditions | Road Conditions | Wisconsin Lottery | Facebook

Lakeland Printing, Inc. • P.O. Box 790 • Minocqua, WI 54548

The Lakeland Times • The Northwoods Super Shopper
Phone: (715) 356-5236 • Fax: (715) 358-2121

Members of the Wisconsin Newspaper Association, Wisconsin Community Papers, Rhinelander Area Chamber of Commerce, Minocqua Area Chamber of Commerce

Software © 1998-2017
1up! Software
, All Rights Reserved